PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGHYX vs. JGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGHYX vs. JGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGHYX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than JGH's 5.15% return. Over the past 10 years, MGHYX has underperformed JGH with an annualized return of 4.96%, while JGH has yielded a comparatively higher 8.41% annualized return.


MGHYX

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.43%
6M
2.26%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
4.96%

JGH

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.82%
YTD
5.15%
6M
7.13%
1Y
10.84%
3Y*
15.83%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGHYX vs. JGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGHYX
DWS Global High Income Fund
1.43%9.82%6.99%11.17%-11.67%3.22%6.83%16.36%-1.85%6.49%
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
5.15%8.62%15.98%20.89%-21.01%10.84%2.77%30.04%-12.02%15.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MGHYX and JGH is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2014

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGHYX vs. JGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGHYX
MGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

JGH
JGH Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
JGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
JGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGH Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGHYX vs. JGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGHYXJGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.22

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.30

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.17

3.16

+9.01

MGHYX vs. JGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the JGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGHYX and JGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGHYXJGHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

1.06

+1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.42

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.53

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.41

-0.38

Drawdowns

MGHYX vs. JGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGHYX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, which is greater than JGH's maximum drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGHYX and JGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGHYXJGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.47%

-43.79%

-9.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-8.37%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.33%

-13.70%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.93%

-28.66%

+12.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.84%

-43.79%

+21.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.78%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.12%

-7.00%

-17.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

3.44%

-2.81%

Volatility

MGHYX vs. JGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) is 0.90%, while Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that MGHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGHYXJGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

3.70%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.31%

7.25%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13%

10.22%

-7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.08%

13.79%

-8.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.89%

15.88%

-9.99%

MGHYX vs. JGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGHYX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than JGH's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGHYX vs. JGH - Dividend Comparison

MGHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, less than JGH's 9.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
9.74%9.82%9.67%10.18%12.05%8.19%7.13%7.53%9.88%8.52%9.61%11.44%
MGHYX
DWS Global High Income Fund
5.69%7.17%5.58%4.35%5.81%4.20%5.81%5.63%6.96%3.76%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGHYX and JGH have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGH has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to MGHYX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGHYX dropped -53.47% vs JGH's -43.79%.

MGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGHYX and JGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer