MGGPX vs. GLQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX) and Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ).
MGGPX is a passively managed fund by Morgan Stanley that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on May 24, 2010. GLQ is managed by Clough Capital. It was launched on Apr 27, 2005.
Performance
MGGPX vs. GLQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGGPX vs. GLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGGPX Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A | -14.99% | 0.77% | 27.16% | 49.29% | -41.77% | -0.05% | 55.05% | 35.03% | -5.96% | 49.03% |
GLQ Clough Global Equity Fund | 1.01% | 28.55% | 25.41% | 2.67% | -42.31% | 6.48% | 28.28% | 23.94% | -9.74% | 32.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGGPX achieves a -14.99% return, which is significantly lower than GLQ's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MGGPX has outperformed GLQ with an annualized return of 11.19%, while GLQ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.06% annualized return.
MGGPX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -12.56%
- YTD
- -14.99%
- 6M
- -26.48%
- 1Y
- -13.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.50%
- 5Y*
- -0.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
GLQ
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -7.98%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 4.31%
- 1Y
- 33.54%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- -2.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGGPX vs. GLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGGPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GLQ's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGGPX vs. GLQ — Risk / Return Rank
MGGPX
GLQ
MGGPX vs. GLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX) and Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGGPX | GLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | 1.78 | -2.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | 2.43 | -3.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.38 | -0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 2.63 | -3.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 11.38 | -12.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGGPX | GLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 1.78 | -2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | -0.11 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.37 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.25 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGGPX and GLQ is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MGGPX vs. GLQ - Dividend Comparison
MGGPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.67%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGGPX Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.95% | 2.27% | 24.31% | 5.14% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 0.40% | 7.23% | 1.29% |
GLQ Clough Global Equity Fund | 10.67% | 10.18% | 10.86% | 12.13% | 21.42% | 12.25% | 9.66% | 10.96% | 13.68% | 9.63% | 11.68% | 11.01% |
Drawdowns
MGGPX vs. GLQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGGPX drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, smaller than the maximum GLQ drawdown of -64.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGGPX and GLQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGGPX | GLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.83% | -64.45% | +12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.32% | -12.58% | -15.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.14% | -57.47% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.83% | -57.47% | +5.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.22% | -18.35% | -9.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -17.36% | +8.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.55% | 2.91% | +7.64% |
Volatility
MGGPX vs. GLQ - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) at 6.95%. This indicates that MGGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGGPX | GLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 6.95% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.41% | 11.38% | +7.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.89% | 18.90% | +5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 20.58% | +5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 21.95% | +0.97% |