MGGIX vs. IWF
Compare and contrast key facts about Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio (MGGIX) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF).
MGGIX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on May 29, 2008. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000.
Performance
MGGIX vs. IWF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGGIX vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGGIX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio | -14.91% | 1.86% | 27.50% | 49.70% | -41.57% | 0.22% | 55.49% | 35.44% | -5.65% | 49.45% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -9.83% | 18.33% | 33.12% | 42.59% | -29.31% | 27.43% | 38.25% | 35.86% | -1.67% | 29.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGGIX achieves a -14.91% return, which is significantly lower than IWF's -9.83% return. Over the past 10 years, MGGIX has underperformed IWF with an annualized return of 11.61%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively higher 16.53% annualized return.
MGGIX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -12.52%
- YTD
- -14.91%
- 6M
- -25.77%
- 1Y
- -12.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.13%
- 5Y*
- -0.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
IWF
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- -9.83%
- 6M
- -8.80%
- 1Y
- 18.54%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 16.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGGIX vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGGIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IWF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGGIX vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank
MGGIX
IWF
MGGIX vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio (MGGIX) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGGIX | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | 0.83 | -1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | 1.35 | -1.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.19 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 1.15 | -1.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 3.95 | -5.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGGIX | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 | 0.83 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.57 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.79 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.36 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGGIX and IWF is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGGIX vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison
MGGIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGGIX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.27% | 2.13% | 22.94% | 4.92% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.79% | 0.39% | 7.04% | 1.26% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.36% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
Drawdowns
MGGIX vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGGIX drawdown since its inception was -59.08%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGGIX and IWF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGGIX | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.08% | -64.25% | +5.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.65% | -16.27% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.02% | -32.72% | -18.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.60% | -32.72% | -18.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.53% | -13.12% | -14.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.17% | -22.21% | +11.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.18% | 4.74% | +5.44% |
Volatility
MGGIX vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio (MGGIX) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) at 6.74%. This indicates that MGGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGGIX | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 6.74% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.87% | 12.36% | +5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.52% | 22.40% | +2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 21.41% | +4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 20.92% | +1.95% |