MGC vs. FTIF
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF).
MGC and FTIF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MGC is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mega Cap Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. FTIF is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Mar 13, 2023. Both MGC and FTIF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MGC vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGC vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | -4.86% | 19.31% | 27.16% | 25.96% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 19.07% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 12.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 19.07% return.
MGC
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- -4.86%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 18.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.78%
FTIF
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 19.07%
- 6M
- 22.37%
- 1Y
- 31.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGC vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGC vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank
MGC
FTIF
MGC vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGC | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.37 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.93 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.30 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.85 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.19 | 9.09 | -1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGC | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.37 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.68 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGC and FTIF is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MGC vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison
MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than FTIF's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 1.01% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.17% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MGC vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, which is greater than FTIF's maximum drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and FTIF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGC | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.93% | -27.83% | -24.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.93% | -17.27% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.33% | -1.03% | -5.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -6.28% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 3.51% | -0.79% |
Volatility
MGC vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 3.87%. This indicates that MGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGC | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 3.87% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 11.65% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.80% | 22.97% | -4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 19.27% | -2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 19.27% | -1.08% |