MG vs. VOO
MG (Mistras Group, Inc.) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, MG returned -3.45%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MG vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MG achieves a 39.13% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MG has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -3.45%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
MG
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- -5.83%
- YTD
- 39.13%
- 6M
- 48.90%
- 1Y
- 133.11%
- 3Y*
- 36.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.53%
- 10Y*
- -3.45%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
MG vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MG Mistras Group, Inc. | 39.13% | 39.62% | 23.77% | 48.48% | -33.65% | -4.25% | -45.62% | -0.76% | -38.73% | -8.61% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MG and VOO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MG vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
MG
VOO
MG vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mistras Group, Inc. (MG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.25 | 2.39 | +0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.52 | 3.25 | +1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.43 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.21 | 3.16 | +6.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.36 | 14.73 | +12.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25 | 2.39 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.83 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | 0.87 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.89 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
MG vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MG drawdown since its inception was -89.21%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MG and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.21% | -33.99% | -55.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -8.90% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.78% | -18.69% | -22.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.87% | -24.52% | -42.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.95% | -33.99% | -54.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.72% | -0.70% | -34.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.51% | -3.69% | -36.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 1.91% | +2.97% |
Volatility
MG vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Mistras Group, Inc. (MG) has a higher volatility of 12.12% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that MG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.12% | 2.84% | +9.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.36% | 8.90% | +15.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.15% | 11.80% | +29.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.15% | 16.81% | +29.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.28% | 18.01% | +33.27% |
Dividends
MG vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
MG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MG Mistras Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MG and VOO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MG has higher volatility (12.12%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MG dropped -89.21% vs VOO's -33.99%.
MG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MG and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer