MFVL vs. TAX
MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) and TAX (Cambria Tax Aware ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFVL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for TAX.
Performance
MFVL vs. TAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than TAX's 8.40% return.
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 8.40%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 23.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL vs. TAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
TAX Cambria Tax Aware ETF | 8.40% | -0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFVL and TAX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFVL vs. TAX — Risk / Return Rank
MFVL
TAX
MFVL vs. TAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Cambria Tax Aware ETF (TAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFVL | TAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.96 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
MFVL vs. TAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum TAX drawdown of -18.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and TAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFVL | TAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -18.85% | +11.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -0.47% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -3.00% | +0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.86% | — |
Volatility
MFVL vs. TAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFVL | TAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 15.75% | -3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 18.77% | -6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 18.77% | -6.62% |
MFVL vs. TAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFVL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TAX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFVL vs. TAX - Dividend Comparison
MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAX Cambria Tax Aware ETF | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFVL and TAX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAX is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAX is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFVL.
TAX has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFVL and 0.49% for TAX.
Find the right allocation for MFVL and TAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer