MFVL vs. DIVZ
MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) and DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MFVL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DIVZ.
Performance
MFVL vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than DIVZ's 3.10% return.
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVZ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 3.41%
- 1Y
- 10.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 3.10% | 1.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFVL and DIVZ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFVL vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank
MFVL
DIVZ
MFVL vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFVL | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.89 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
MFVL vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum DIVZ drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and DIVZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFVL | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -15.42% | +8.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -4.50% | +1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -3.49% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.35% | — |
Volatility
MFVL vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFVL | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 9.28% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 12.65% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 12.57% | -0.42% |
MFVL vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFVL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFVL vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison
MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 2.60% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.83% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFVL and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.
DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFVL and 0.65% for DIVZ.
Find the right allocation for MFVL and DIVZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer