MFVL vs. BAMV
Compare and contrast key facts about Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV).
MFVL and BAMV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MFVL is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025. BAMV is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023.
Performance
MFVL vs. BAMV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFVL vs. BAMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | -1.60% | 1.39% |
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF | 0.50% | 0.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than BAMV's 0.50% return.
MFVL
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAMV
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFVL vs. BAMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFVL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMV's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFVL vs. BAMV — Risk / Return Rank
MFVL
BAMV
MFVL vs. BAMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFVL | BAMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.99 | -1.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFVL and BAMV is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MFVL vs. BAMV - Dividend Comparison
MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF | 1.26% | 1.32% | 3.66% | 0.19% |
Drawdowns
MFVL vs. BAMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -6.49%, smaller than the maximum BAMV drawdown of -14.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and BAMV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFVL | BAMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -14.56% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.21% | -3.80% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -2.09% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.87% | — |
Volatility
MFVL vs. BAMV - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFVL | BAMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.67% | 16.72% | -5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.67% | 13.89% | -2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.67% | 13.89% | -2.22% |