PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFUT vs. SYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFUT vs. SYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUT achieves a 17.76% return, which is significantly lower than SYLD's 21.09% return.


MFUT

1D
0.31%
1M
5.39%
6M
9.31%
YTD
17.76%
1Y
32.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-1.69%

SYLD

1D
-0.62%
1M
3.76%
6M
14.53%
YTD
21.09%
1Y
33.00%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
13.60%
ALL TIME*
12.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$88.88K$72.41K$209.22K
$2.75M$2.44M$3.15M

MFUT vs. SYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MFUT
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF
17.76%-1.83%-16.64%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
21.09%3.94%-1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MFUT and SYLD is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2024

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFUT vs. SYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MFUT
MFUT Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SYLD
SYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MFUT vs. SYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFUTSYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

4.46

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.45

13.19

-4.74

MFUT vs. SYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFUT Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the SYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUT and SYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFUT vs. SYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUT drawdown since its inception was -29.28%, smaller than the maximum SYLD drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUT and SYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFUTSYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.28%

-45.36%

+16.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-6.93%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.31%

-1.86%

-2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.78%

-5.61%

-10.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

2.34%

+1.36%

Volatility

MFUT vs. SYLD - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) have volatilities of 4.07% and 3.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFUTSYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

3.97%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

9.26%

+3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.72%

15.01%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.68%

20.26%

-6.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.68%

22.92%

-9.24%

MFUT vs. SYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUT has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFUT vs. SYLD - Dividend Comparison

MFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFUT
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF
0.00%0.00%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
1.83%2.25%2.04%1.92%2.20%2.37%1.99%2.08%2.52%1.57%1.92%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFUT and SYLD have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFUT has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to SYLD (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUT dropped -29.28% vs SYLD's -45.36%.

On 1-year performance, SYLD leads with 33.00% vs 32.56% for MFUT. On fees, SYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 33.00% return vs 32.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.18% for MFUT.

SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for MFUT.

MFUT is categorized as Systematic Trend, while SYLD is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.18% for MFUT and 0.59% for SYLD.

SYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFUT and SYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer