MFUT vs. GXDW
MFUT (Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF) and GXDW (Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. MFUT is actively managed, while GXDW is passively managed. Over the past year, MFUT returned 26.84% vs -4.72% for GXDW. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MFUT charges 1.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GXDW.
Performance
MFUT vs. GXDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFUT achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly higher than GXDW's 0.52% return.
MFUT
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 15.99%
- 1Y
- 26.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXDW
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -12.96%
- 6M
- -6.91%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- -4.72%
- 3Y*
- -4.61%
- 5Y*
- -12.49%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUT vs. GXDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MFUT Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF | 15.99% | -1.83% | -16.64% |
GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF | 0.52% | 3.52% | -0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFUT and GXDW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2024 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFUT vs. GXDW — Risk / Return Rank
MFUT
GXDW
MFUT vs. GXDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT) and Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFUT | GXDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.00 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | -0.19 | +2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | -0.42 | +7.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFUT vs. GXDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFUT drawdown since its inception was -29.28%, smaller than the maximum GXDW drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUT and GXDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFUT | GXDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.28% | -67.81% | +38.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.89% | -24.65% | +14.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -60.27% | +54.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.07% | -43.26% | +27.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 11.26% | -7.70% |
Volatility
MFUT vs. GXDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT) is 5.35%, while Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW) has a volatility of 11.81%. This indicates that MFUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFUT | GXDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 11.81% | -6.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | 23.39% | -10.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 29.48% | -13.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 28.39% | -14.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 29.93% | -16.27% |
MFUT vs. GXDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFUT has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than GXDW's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFUT vs. GXDW - Dividend Comparison
MFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF | 1.49% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
MFUT Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFUT and GXDW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXDW has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to MFUT (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUT dropped -29.28% vs GXDW's -67.81%.
On 1-year performance, MFUT leads with 26.84% vs -4.72% for GXDW. On fees, GXDW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MFUT has been the lower-risk option at 5.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MFUT has performed better with a 26.84% return vs -4.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXDW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.18% for MFUT.
GXDW has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for MFUT.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.18% for MFUT and 0.50% for GXDW.
MFUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFUT and GXDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer