PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFUS vs. HYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFUS vs. HYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than HYS's 1.34% return.


MFUS

1D
0.19%
1M
4.47%
YTD
16.59%
6M
16.69%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*

HYS

1D
0.01%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.34%
6M
1.89%
1Y
6.88%
3Y*
8.65%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
5.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFUS vs. HYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.59%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%26.17%-7.30%11.20%
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.34%8.80%8.42%11.38%-5.42%4.77%3.27%10.22%-1.05%0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MFUS and HYS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.63

The correlation between MFUS and HYS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFUS vs. HYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MFUS
HYS

Technology

21.8%

-

Healthcare

13.5%

-

Industrials

12.6%

-

Financial Services

12.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.3%

-

Energy

7.0%

-

Communication Services

5.3%
100.0%

Basic Materials

2.8%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Utilities

1.7%

-

Technology

MFUS
21.8%
HYS

-

Healthcare

MFUS
13.5%
HYS

-

Industrials

MFUS
12.6%
HYS

-

Financial Services

MFUS
12.6%
HYS

-

Consumer Cyclical

MFUS
10.6%
HYS

-

Consumer Defensive

MFUS
10.3%
HYS

-

Energy

MFUS
7.0%
HYS

-

Communication Services

MFUS
5.3%
HYS
100.0%

Basic Materials

MFUS
2.8%
HYS

-

Real Estate

MFUS
1.8%
HYS

-

Utilities

MFUS
1.7%
HYS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFUS vs. HYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

HYS
HYS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
HYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUS vs. HYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFUSHYSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.38

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

3.67

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.52

14.96

+3.56

MFUS vs. HYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the HYS Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUS and HYS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFUSHYSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

1.99

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.82

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.81

-0.02

Drawdowns

MFUS vs. HYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than HYS's maximum drawdown of -20.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and HYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFUSHYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-20.91%

-14.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-1.88%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

-4.98%

-10.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

-10.61%

-7.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-1.53%

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

0.46%

+1.09%

Volatility

MFUS vs. HYS - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) at 1.23%. This indicates that MFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFUSHYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

1.23%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

2.72%

+5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.71%

3.47%

+7.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

6.26%

+8.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

6.84%

+10.51%

MFUS vs. HYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HYS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFUS vs. HYS - Dividend Comparison

MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than HYS's 7.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
7.36%7.20%7.43%6.44%5.01%3.74%4.52%4.98%4.64%5.01%5.13%5.22%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.35%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFUS and HYS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFUS has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to HYS (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs HYS's -20.91%.

On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.86% vs 5.08% for HYS. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, HYS has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.86% return vs 5.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for HYS.

HYS has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 1.35% for MFUS.

MFUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HYS is High Yield Bonds. MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​, while HYS tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (0-5 Y). Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.56% for HYS.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFUS and HYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer