MFUS vs. HYS
MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) and HYS (PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index, while HYS is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (0-5 Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFUS returned 12.86%/yr vs 5.08%/yr for HYS. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFUS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for HYS.
Performance
MFUS vs. HYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than HYS's 1.34% return.
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- —
HYS
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 6.88%
- 3Y*
- 8.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.31%
MFUS vs. HYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.59% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -7.30% | 11.20% |
HYS PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.34% | 8.80% | 8.42% | 11.38% | -5.42% | 4.77% | 3.27% | 10.22% | -1.05% | 0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFUS and HYS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.63 |
The correlation between MFUS and HYS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFUS vs. HYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFUS
HYS
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MFUS
HYS
-
Healthcare
MFUS
HYS
-
Industrials
MFUS
HYS
-
Financial Services
MFUS
HYS
-
Consumer Cyclical
MFUS
HYS
-
Consumer Defensive
MFUS
HYS
-
Energy
MFUS
HYS
-
Communication Services
MFUS
HYS
Basic Materials
MFUS
HYS
-
Real Estate
MFUS
HYS
-
Utilities
MFUS
HYS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFUS vs. HYS — Risk / Return Rank
MFUS
HYS
MFUS vs. HYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFUS | HYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.38 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 3.67 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.52 | 14.96 | +3.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFUS | HYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 1.99 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.82 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.81 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
MFUS vs. HYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than HYS's maximum drawdown of -20.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and HYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFUS | HYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -20.91% | -14.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -1.88% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | -4.98% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.22% | -10.61% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -1.53% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 0.46% | +1.09% |
Volatility
MFUS vs. HYS - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) at 1.23%. This indicates that MFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFUS | HYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 1.23% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 2.72% | +5.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 3.47% | +7.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 6.26% | +8.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 6.84% | +10.51% |
MFUS vs. HYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HYS's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFUS vs. HYS - Dividend Comparison
MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than HYS's 7.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYS PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF | 7.36% | 7.20% | 7.43% | 6.44% | 5.01% | 3.74% | 4.52% | 4.98% | 4.64% | 5.01% | 5.13% | 5.22% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFUS and HYS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFUS has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to HYS (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs HYS's -20.91%.
On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.86% vs 5.08% for HYS. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, HYS has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.86% return vs 5.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for HYS.
HYS has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 1.35% for MFUS.
MFUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HYS is High Yield Bonds. MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index, while HYS tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (0-5 Y). Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.56% for HYS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFUS and HYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer