MFUL vs. THRV
MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFUL charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
MFUL vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFUL achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 2.25% return.
MFUL
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 7.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFUL vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 3.57% | 0.12% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 2.25% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFUL and THRV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFUL vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
MFUL
THRV
MFUL vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFUL | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.74 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFUL | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 1.26 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
MFUL vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFUL drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUL and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFUL | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.41% | -1.50% | -14.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.13% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.51% | -0.44% | -9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | — | — |
Volatility
MFUL vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFUL | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.92% | 2.89% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.24% | 2.89% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.24% | 2.89% | +1.35% |
MFUL vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFUL has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFUL vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
MFUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than THRV's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 3.00% | 3.31% | 2.59% | 5.00% | 0.29% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.69% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFUL and THRV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFUL is cheaper at 1.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFUL is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 3.00% for MFUL.
They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for MFUL and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for MFUL and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer