PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFUL vs. SPLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFUL vs. SPLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) and PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MFUL

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
2.90%
6M
2.47%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
10Y*

SPLS

1D
0.03%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFUL vs. SPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MFUL and SPLS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFUL vs. SPLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUL
MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SPLS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUL vs. SPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) and PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFULSPLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

MFUL vs. SPLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFUL vs. SPLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUL drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, which is greater than SPLS's maximum drawdown of -9.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUL and SPLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFULSPLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.41%

-9.24%

-7.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-3.25%

+2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-1.90%

-7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

Volatility

MFUL vs. SPLS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFULSPLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

15.48%

-11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.29%

15.48%

-11.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.29%

15.48%

-11.19%

MFUL vs. SPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUL has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLS's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFUL vs. SPLS - Dividend Comparison

MFUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than SPLS's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
3.02%3.31%2.59%5.00%0.29%
SPLS
PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF
0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MFUL and SPLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPLS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPLS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.

MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 0.22% for SPLS.

They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for MFUL and 0.18% for SPLS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFUL and SPLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer