PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFTFX vs. QMHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFTFX vs. QMHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFTFX achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than QMHNX's 12.31% return. Over the past 10 years, MFTFX has outperformed QMHNX with an annualized return of 4.72%, while QMHNX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.37% annualized return.


MFTFX

1D
-0.90%
1M
-0.30%
6M
0.91%
YTD
8.17%
1Y
38.20%
3Y*
1.48%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
4.72%
ALL TIME*
2.82%

QMHNX

1D
0.09%
1M
3.44%
6M
5.00%
YTD
12.31%
1Y
30.37%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
17.32%
10Y*
4.37%
ALL TIME*
5.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MFTFX vs. QMHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
8.17%9.29%6.87%-13.57%57.88%2.13%-4.13%15.17%-19.70%19.09%
QMHNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N
12.31%19.65%10.48%-0.40%49.64%-2.30%-0.85%1.55%-14.59%-2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MFTFX and QMHNX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.67

The correlation between MFTFX and QMHNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFTFX vs. QMHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MFTFX
MFTFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MFTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
MFTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

QMHNX
QMHNX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QMHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QMHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MFTFX vs. QMHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFTFXQMHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.10

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.39

10.65

-3.26

MFTFX vs. QMHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFTFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the QMHNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFTFX and QMHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFTFX vs. QMHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFTFX drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, smaller than the maximum QMHNX drawdown of -40.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFTFX and QMHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFTFXQMHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-40.29%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-8.74%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.57%

-19.23%

-13.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.57%

-19.23%

-13.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.70%

-33.81%

-1.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.93%

-5.60%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.87%

-18.10%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

2.54%

+1.47%

Volatility

MFTFX vs. QMHNX - Volatility Comparison

Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) at 5.28%. This indicates that MFTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFTFXQMHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

5.28%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

10.96%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.54%

14.14%

+5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.86%

17.27%

+4.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.08%

15.29%

+6.79%

MFTFX vs. QMHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFTFX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than QMHNX's 4.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFTFX vs. QMHNX - Dividend Comparison

MFTFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QMHNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.75%41.04%2.30%0.00%20.00%7.84%2.12%9.36%1.21%
QMHNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N
1.68%1.89%2.09%7.36%8.75%10.64%7.79%3.80%0.00%0.00%0.01%7.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFTFX and QMHNX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFTFX has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to QMHNX (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFTFX dropped -35.70% vs QMHNX's -40.29%.

QMHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFTFX and QMHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer