PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFTFX vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFTFX vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFTFX achieves a 17.48% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MFTFX has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 6.34%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.31% annualized return.


MFTFX

1D
0.70%
1M
3.90%
YTD
17.48%
6M
23.33%
1Y
45.25%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
6.34%

MTUM

1D
1.06%
1M
15.90%
YTD
31.75%
6M
32.38%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFTFX vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
17.48%9.29%6.87%-13.57%57.88%2.13%-4.13%15.17%-19.70%19.09%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.75%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MFTFX and MTUM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013

0.17

The correlation between MFTFX and MTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFTFX vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFTFX
MFTFX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MFTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MFTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFTFX vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFTFXMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.66

3.64

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.07

14.50

-1.43

MFTFX vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFTFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFTFX and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFTFXMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.20

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.74

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.83

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.85

-0.66

Drawdowns

MFTFX vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFTFX drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFTFX and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFTFXMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-34.08%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-11.54%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.57%

-20.99%

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.57%

-32.28%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.70%

-34.08%

-1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.99%

-6.21%

-10.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

2.89%

+0.60%

Volatility

MFTFX vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) is 4.01%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that MFTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFTFXMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

7.68%

-3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

16.46%

-4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.61%

19.04%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.05%

20.60%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.14%

21.03%

+1.11%

MFTFX vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFTFX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFTFX vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

MFTFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.75%41.04%2.30%0.00%20.00%7.84%2.12%9.36%1.21%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFTFX and MTUM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to MFTFX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFTFX dropped -35.70% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

MFTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFTFX and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer