MFSV vs. HDV
MFSV (MFS Active Value ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by MFS, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. MFSV is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. Over the past year, MFSV returned 12.83% vs 20.35% for HDV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFSV charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
MFSV vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFSV achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 12.69% return.
MFSV
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
MFSV vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MFSV MFS Active Value ETF | 4.53% | 13.63% | -4.64% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.69% | 11.90% | -4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFSV and HDV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024 | 0.72 |
The correlation between MFSV and HDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFSV vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
MFSV
HDV
MFSV vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFSV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.95 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.96 | 11.02 | -4.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFSV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 2.10 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.72 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
MFSV vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFSV drawdown since its inception was -12.74%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSV and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFSV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.74% | -37.04% | +24.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | -5.18% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -2.54% | +1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -3.09% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 1.85% | 0.00% |
Volatility
MFSV vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is 2.30%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that MFSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFSV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 3.19% | -0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.59% | 7.56% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.21% | 9.73% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 12.82% | +0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 15.73% | -2.00% |
MFSV vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFSV has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFSV vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
MFSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than HDV's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
MFSV MFS Active Value ETF | 1.51% | 1.53% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFSV and HDV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to MFSV (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSV dropped -12.74% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 1-year performance, HDV leads with 20.35% vs 12.83% for MFSV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, MFSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HDV has performed better with a 20.35% return vs 12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for MFSV.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.51% for MFSV.
MFSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: MFS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for MFSV and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFSV and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer