MFSI vs. MCSE
MFSI (MFS Active International ETF) and MCSE (Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MFSI returned 21.34% vs 4.30% for MCSE. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
MFSI vs. MCSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFSI achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly higher than MCSE's 1.12% return.
MFSI
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 9.83%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.33%
MCSE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- -0.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $6.47M | $6.70M | $6.63M |
MFSI vs. MCSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MFSI MFS Active International ETF | 9.83% | 26.43% | -3.45% |
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF | 1.12% | 7.79% | -4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFSI and MCSE is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between MFSI and MCSE shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFSI vs. MCSE — Risk / Return Rank
MFSI
MCSE
MFSI vs. MCSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFSI | MCSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.10 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 0.37 | +1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.26 | 0.92 | +6.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFSI vs. MCSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFSI drawdown since its inception was -13.67%, smaller than the maximum MCSE drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSI and MCSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFSI | MCSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.67% | -26.36% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -10.42% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -10.51% | +10.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -8.79% | +6.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 4.36% | -1.41% |
Volatility
MFSI vs. MCSE - Volatility Comparison
MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that MFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFSI | MCSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 0.00% | +4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 1.91% | +11.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 10.71% | +4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 19.08% | -2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 19.08% | -2.77% |
MFSI vs. MCSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MFSI and MCSE have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
MFSI vs. MCSE - Dividend Comparison
MFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than MCSE's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF | 3.74% | 3.78% | 0.63% | 0.57% | 0.48% |
MFSI MFS Active International ETF | 0.75% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFSI and MCSE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFSI has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSI dropped -13.67% vs MCSE's -26.36%.
On 1-year performance, MFSI leads with 21.34% vs 4.30% for MCSE. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, MCSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MFSI has performed better with a 21.34% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFSI and MCSE have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 0.75% for MFSI.
They also come from different issuers: MFS and Franklin.
MFSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFSI and MCSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer