PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFSI vs. MFSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFSI vs. MFSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) and MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFSI achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than MFSG's 8.56% return.


MFSI

1D
0.83%
1M
5.05%
YTD
7.98%
6M
10.73%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MFSG

1D
-0.07%
1M
5.23%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.08%
1Y
23.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFSI vs. MFSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MFSI
MFS Active International ETF
7.98%26.43%-4.21%
MFSG
MFS Active Growth ETF
8.56%14.51%-2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MFSI and MFSG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024

0.63

The correlation between MFSI and MFSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFSI vs. MFSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFSI
MFSI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

MFSG
MFSG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MFSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFSG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MFSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFSG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFSI vs. MFSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) and MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFSIMFSGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

1.46

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

2.03

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

1.48

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.71

5.16

+1.55

MFSI vs. MFSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the MFSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFSI and MFSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFSIMFSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.46

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

0.64

+0.59

Drawdowns

MFSI vs. MFSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFSI drawdown since its inception was -13.67%, smaller than the maximum MFSG drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSI and MFSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFSIMFSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.67%

-23.24%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-16.15%

+4.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.07%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-4.68%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

4.63%

-1.65%

Volatility

MFSI vs. MFSG - Volatility Comparison

MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG) at 3.54%. This indicates that MFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFSIMFSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

3.54%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

12.38%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.60%

15.97%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

21.70%

-5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

21.70%

-5.39%

MFSI vs. MFSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFSI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MFSG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFSI vs. MFSG - Dividend Comparison

MFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than MFSG's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025
MFSG
MFS Active Growth ETF
0.07%0.08%
MFSI
MFS Active International ETF
0.75%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFSI and MFSG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFSI has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to MFSG (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSI dropped -13.67% vs MFSG's -23.24%.

On 1-year performance, MFSG leads with 23.23% vs 18.65% for MFSI. On fees, MFSG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MFSG has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MFSG has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 18.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MFSG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MFSI.

MFSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.07% for MFSG.

MFSI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MFSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MFSI and 0.49% for MFSG.

MFSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFSI and MFSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer