MFSI vs. MFSG
MFSI (MFS Active International ETF) and MFSG (MFS Active Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFSI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by MFS, while MFSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by MFS. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MFSI returned 18.65% vs 23.23% for MFSG. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFSI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MFSG.
Performance
MFSI vs. MFSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFSI achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than MFSG's 8.56% return.
MFSI
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 18.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFSG
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 23.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFSI vs. MFSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MFSI MFS Active International ETF | 7.98% | 26.43% | -4.21% |
MFSG MFS Active Growth ETF | 8.56% | 14.51% | -2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFSI and MFSG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024 | 0.63 |
The correlation between MFSI and MFSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFSI vs. MFSG — Risk / Return Rank
MFSI
MFSG
MFSI vs. MFSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) and MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFSI | MFSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 1.46 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 2.03 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 1.48 | +0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.71 | 5.16 | +1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFSI | MFSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.46 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.64 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
MFSI vs. MFSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFSI drawdown since its inception was -13.67%, smaller than the maximum MFSG drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSI and MFSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFSI | MFSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.67% | -23.24% | +9.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -16.15% | +4.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.07% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -4.68% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 4.63% | -1.65% |
Volatility
MFSI vs. MFSG - Volatility Comparison
MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG) at 3.54%. This indicates that MFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFSI | MFSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 3.54% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.11% | 12.38% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.60% | 15.97% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 21.70% | -5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 21.70% | -5.39% |
MFSI vs. MFSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFSI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MFSG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFSI vs. MFSG - Dividend Comparison
MFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than MFSG's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MFSG MFS Active Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% |
MFSI MFS Active International ETF | 0.75% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFSI and MFSG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFSI has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to MFSG (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSI dropped -13.67% vs MFSG's -23.24%.
On 1-year performance, MFSG leads with 23.23% vs 18.65% for MFSI. On fees, MFSG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MFSG has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MFSG has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 18.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFSG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MFSI.
MFSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.07% for MFSG.
MFSI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MFSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MFSI and 0.49% for MFSG.
MFSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFSI and MFSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer