MFSI vs. JHID
MFSI (MFS Active International ETF) and JHID (John Hancock International High Dividend ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MFSI returned 17.49% vs 33.07% for JHID. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFSI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for JHID.
Performance
MFSI vs. JHID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFSI achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than JHID's 12.92% return.
MFSI
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 17.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHID
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 16.07%
- 1Y
- 33.07%
- 3Y*
- 22.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFSI vs. JHID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MFSI MFS Active International ETF | 6.73% | 26.43% | -4.21% |
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF | 12.92% | 41.47% | -3.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFSI and JHID is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MFSI and JHID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFSI vs. JHID — Risk / Return Rank
MFSI
JHID
MFSI vs. JHID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) and John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFSI | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.47 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 3.95 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | 15.40 | -9.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFSI | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 2.63 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 1.57 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
MFSI vs. JHID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFSI drawdown since its inception was -13.67%, which is greater than JHID's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSI and JHID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFSI | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.67% | -12.42% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -8.42% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -1.54% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -2.46% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.15% | +0.83% |
Volatility
MFSI vs. JHID - Volatility Comparison
MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID) at 3.98%. This indicates that MFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFSI | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 3.98% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 10.38% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.62% | 12.65% | +1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 13.92% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 13.92% | +2.40% |
MFSI vs. JHID - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFSI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than JHID's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFSI vs. JHID - Dividend Comparison
MFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than JHID's 2.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF | 2.88% | 3.13% | 5.15% | 5.23% |
MFSI MFS Active International ETF | 0.76% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFSI and JHID have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFSI has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to JHID (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSI dropped -13.67% vs JHID's -12.42%.
On 1-year performance, JHID leads with 33.07% vs 17.49% for MFSI. On fees, JHID is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, JHID has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JHID has performed better with a 33.07% return vs 17.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHID is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MFSI.
JHID has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 0.76% for MFSI.
They also come from different issuers: MFS and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MFSI and 0.46% for JHID.
JHID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFSI and JHID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer