MFSI vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MFSI (MFS Active International ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFSI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by MFS, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. MFSI is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, MFSI returned 17.49% vs 1800.91% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. MFSI charges 0.59%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

MFSI vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFSI achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 875.88% return.

MFSI

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: 5.04%
• YTD: 6.73%
• 6M: 9.01%
• 1Y: 17.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 4.26%
• 1M: 9.15%
• YTD: 875.88%
• 6M: 735.56%
• 1Y: 1,800.91%
• 3Y*: 129.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFSI vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MFSI MFS Active International ETF	6.73%	26.43%	-4.21%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	875.88%	96.22%	-10.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MFSI and BWET is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024	-0.08

Return for Risk

MFSI vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFSI

MFSI Risk / Return Rank: 34
MFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
MFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
MFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 38

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFSI vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFSI	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	18.57	-17.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	6.55	-4.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.96	-0.74
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	59.51	-57.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.89	158.07	-152.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFSI vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 18.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFSI and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFSI	BWET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	18.57	-17.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	1.90	-0.73

Drawdowns

MFSI vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFSI drawdown since its inception was -13.67%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSI and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFSI	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.67%	-56.90%	+43.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.17%	-30.64%	+19.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	-11.29%	+10.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.97%	-24.09%	+22.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	11.51%	-8.53%

Volatility

MFSI vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) is 4.72%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that MFSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFSI	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	33.96%	-29.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.16%	88.49%	-76.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.62%	98.35%	-83.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.32%	70.45%	-54.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.32%	70.45%	-54.13%

MFSI vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFSI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFSI vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

MFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%
MFSI MFS Active International ETF	0.76%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFSI and BWET in my portfolio?

MFSI and BWET have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MFSI or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to MFSI (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSI dropped -13.67% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, MFSI or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1800.91% vs 17.49% for MFSI. On fees, MFSI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MFSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MFSI or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1800.91% return vs 17.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFSI or BWET?

MFSI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFSI or BWET?

MFSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between MFSI and BWET?

MFSI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: MFS and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MFSI and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.57 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.