MFQTX vs. SWLGX
MFQTX (AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund) and SWLGX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MFQTX returned 3.42%/yr vs 13.10%/yr for SWLGX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFQTX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWLGX.
Performance
MFQTX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFQTX achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's 5.08% return.
MFQTX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- 6M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- -10.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.19%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
SWLGX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 1Y
- 16.56%
- 3Y*
- 22.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- —
MFQTX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFQTX AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund | -1.74% | -1.59% | 23.14% | 22.81% | -21.08% | 17.63% | 8.44% | 28.37% | -3.66% | -0.68% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 5.08% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFQTX and SWLGX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MFQTX and SWLGX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFQTX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
MFQTX
SWLGX
MFQTX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund (MFQTX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFQTX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.18 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 1.01 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 3.21 | -4.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFQTX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFQTX drawdown since its inception was -57.67%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFQTX and SWLGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFQTX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.67% | -32.69% | -24.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.00% | -16.16% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.60% | -23.30% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.69% | -32.69% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.49% | -3.61% | -9.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.33% | -7.03% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.36% | 5.07% | +6.29% |
Volatility
MFQTX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund (MFQTX) is 4.34%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 6.49%. This indicates that MFQTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFQTX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 6.49% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.84% | 13.27% | -2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 16.60% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 21.69% | -3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 22.67% | -3.71% |
MFQTX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFQTX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFQTX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
MFQTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFQTX AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.87% | 2.45% | 5.59% | 139.81% | 1.67% | 0.72% | 1.95% | 0.47% | 1.19% | 0.57% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFQTX and SWLGX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWLGX has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to MFQTX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFQTX dropped -57.67% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.
SWLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFQTX and SWLGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer