PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFQTX vs. ARSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFQTX vs. ARSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund (MFQTX) and AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFQTX achieves a -4.07% return, which is significantly lower than ARSVX's -0.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MFQTX having a 8.64% annualized return and ARSVX not far ahead at 8.84%.


MFQTX

1D
-1.17%
1M
2.43%
YTD
-4.07%
6M
-12.79%
1Y
-9.94%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
8.64%

ARSVX

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
-0.70%
6M
-10.33%
1Y
-5.57%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
8.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFQTX vs. ARSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFQTX
AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund
-4.07%-1.59%23.14%22.81%-21.08%17.63%8.44%28.37%-3.66%18.28%
ARSVX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund
-0.70%-7.36%14.05%14.86%-6.49%21.14%1.84%38.29%-6.96%11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MFQTX and ARSVX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2005

0.83

The correlation between MFQTX and ARSVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (3 years) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFQTX vs. ARSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFQTX
MFQTX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MFQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MFQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ARSVX
ARSVX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ARSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFQTX vs. ARSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund (MFQTX) and AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFQTXARSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.97

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

-0.27

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

-0.56

-0.42

MFQTX vs. ARSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFQTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the ARSVX Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFQTX and ARSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFQTXARSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

-0.27

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.17

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.46

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.40

-0.03

Drawdowns

MFQTX vs. ARSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFQTX drawdown since its inception was -57.67%, which is greater than ARSVX's maximum drawdown of -54.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFQTX and ARSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFQTXARSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.67%

-54.85%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.00%

-16.62%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.60%

-19.21%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.69%

-19.21%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.58%

-40.52%

+2.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.54%

-13.56%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-8.68%

-1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.38%

8.08%

+2.30%

Volatility

MFQTX vs. ARSVX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund (MFQTX) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) at 3.58%. This indicates that MFQTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFQTXARSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

3.58%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

13.76%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

17.10%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.43%

17.86%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.98%

19.35%

-0.37%

MFQTX vs. ARSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFQTX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSVX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFQTX vs. ARSVX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MFQTX nor ARSVX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSVX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%8.50%4.78%3.87%7.75%0.00%12.10%13.01%14.96%4.96%6.51%
MFQTX
AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund
0.00%0.00%18.87%2.45%5.59%139.81%1.67%0.72%1.95%0.47%1.19%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFQTX and ARSVX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFQTX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to ARSVX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFQTX dropped -57.67% vs ARSVX's -54.85%.

ARSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFQTX and ARSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer