MFIOX vs. FISCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MFIOX (MFS Income Fund) and FISCX (Franklin Convertible Securities Fund) are both mutual funds - MFIOX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by MFS, while FISCX is a Convertible Bonds fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, MFIOX returned 2.75%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for FISCX. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MFIOX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for FISCX.

Performance

MFIOX vs. FISCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Income Fund (MFIOX) and Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFIOX achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than FISCX's 11.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MFIOX has underperformed FISCX with an annualized return of 2.75%, while FISCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.37% annualized return.

MFIOX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 5.85%
• 3Y*: 5.05%
• 5Y*: 0.75%
• 10Y*: 2.75%

FISCX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 5.98%
• YTD: 11.36%
• 6M: 11.31%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: 16.62%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 12.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFIOX vs. FISCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFIOX MFS Income Fund	0.63%	7.37%	2.66%	7.46%	-14.14%	-0.28%	9.47%	11.36%	-2.38%	5.73%
FISCX Franklin Convertible Securities Fund	11.36%	13.63%	16.62%	9.96%	-15.95%	-5.70%	46.28%	33.99%	4.15%	17.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MFIOX and FISCX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 1987	0.11

The correlation between MFIOX and FISCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MFIOX vs. FISCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFIOX

MFIOX Risk / Return Rank: 31
MFIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
MFIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
MFIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MFIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MFIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FISCX

FISCX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FISCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FISCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FISCX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FISCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FISCX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFIOX vs. FISCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Income Fund (MFIOX) and Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFIOX	FISCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.46	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	3.39	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.44	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	4.03	-1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.63	16.49	-9.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFIOX vs. FISCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFIOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the FISCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFIOX and FISCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFIOX	FISCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	2.46	-0.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.39	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.92	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.81	+0.55

Drawdowns

MFIOX vs. FISCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFIOX drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, smaller than the maximum FISCX drawdown of -49.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIOX and FISCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFIOX	FISCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-49.16%	+30.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.81%	-6.38%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.88%	-12.95%	+7.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.07%	-34.37%	+15.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.07%	-34.37%	+15.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	0.00%	-0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-6.91%	+4.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	1.56%	-0.68%

Volatility

MFIOX vs. FISCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Income Fund (MFIOX) is 1.29%, while Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that MFIOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFIOX	FISCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.29%	2.88%	-1.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.59%	8.47%	-5.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.69%	10.45%	-6.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.51%	12.40%	-6.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.87%	13.48%	-8.61%

MFIOX vs. FISCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFIOX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FISCX's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFIOX vs. FISCX - Dividend Comparison

MFIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than FISCX's 8.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FISCX Franklin Convertible Securities Fund	8.89%	9.94%	4.87%	2.22%	8.70%	8.10%	11.30%	16.05%	7.09%	7.68%	4.62%	4.68%
MFIOX MFS Income Fund	4.70%	4.70%	5.04%	4.72%	2.24%	3.29%	2.80%	3.04%	3.07%	3.26%	3.61%	4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFIOX and FISCX in my portfolio?

MFIOX and FISCX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MFIOX or FISCX?

FISCX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to MFIOX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFIOX dropped -19.07% vs FISCX's -49.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FISCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.