MFIOX vs. MFBFX
MFIOX (MFS Income Fund) and MFBFX (MFS Corporate Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - MFIOX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by MFS, while MFBFX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by MFS. Over the past 10 years, MFIOX returned 2.72%/yr vs 2.40%/yr for MFBFX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFIOX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for MFBFX.
Performance
MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFIOX achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than MFBFX's 0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MFIOX has outperformed MFBFX with an annualized return of 2.72%, while MFBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.40% annualized return.
MFIOX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
MFBFX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- 4.90%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- 2.40%
MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFIOX MFS Income Fund | 0.63% | 7.37% | 2.66% | 7.46% | -14.14% | -0.28% | 9.47% | 11.36% | -2.38% | 5.73% |
MFBFX MFS Corporate Bond Fund | 0.70% | 7.35% | 2.03% | 8.09% | -17.27% | -1.47% | 11.01% | 14.43% | -3.19% | 6.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFIOX and MFBFX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 1987 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, MFIOX and MFBFX have become more correlated (0.94) than their long-term average of 0.72, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFIOX vs. MFBFX — Risk / Return Rank
MFIOX
MFBFX
MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Income Fund (MFIOX) and MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFIOX | MFBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.24 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.73 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.80 | 5.65 | +0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFIOX drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, smaller than the maximum MFBFX drawdown of -29.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIOX and MFBFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFIOX | MFBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.07% | -29.78% | +10.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | -3.17% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.88% | -6.83% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.07% | -23.44% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.07% | -23.44% | +4.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -2.87% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -6.19% | +4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.97% | -0.05% |
Volatility
MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Income Fund (MFIOX) is 1.14%, while MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that MFIOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFIOX | MFBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 1.21% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 3.07% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.63% | 4.08% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.52% | 6.40% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 5.74% | -0.86% |
MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFIOX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than MFBFX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Dividend Comparison
MFIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than MFBFX's 4.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFBFX MFS Corporate Bond Fund | 4.53% | 4.54% | 3.74% | 3.16% | 2.46% | 5.61% | 3.47% | 3.01% | 3.15% | 3.07% | 3.27% | 4.16% |
MFIOX MFS Income Fund | 4.70% | 4.70% | 5.04% | 4.72% | 2.24% | 3.29% | 2.80% | 3.04% | 3.07% | 3.26% | 3.61% | 4.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, MFIOX and MFBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MFBFX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to MFIOX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFIOX dropped -19.07% vs MFBFX's -29.78%.
MFIOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFIOX and MFBFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer