PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFIOX vs. MFBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Income Fund (MFIOX) and MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFIOX achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than MFBFX's 0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MFIOX has outperformed MFBFX with an annualized return of 2.72%, while MFBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.40% annualized return.


MFIOX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.92%
YTD
0.63%
6M
1.01%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
2.72%

MFBFX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.02%
YTD
0.70%
6M
1.08%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
-0.25%
10Y*
2.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFIOX
MFS Income Fund
0.63%7.37%2.66%7.46%-14.14%-0.28%9.47%11.36%-2.38%5.73%
MFBFX
MFS Corporate Bond Fund
0.70%7.35%2.03%8.09%-17.27%-1.47%11.01%14.43%-3.19%6.08%

Correlation

The correlation between MFIOX and MFBFX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 1987

0.72

Over the past year, MFIOX and MFBFX have become more correlated (0.94) than their long-term average of 0.72, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFIOX vs. MFBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFIOX
MFIOX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MFIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MFIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

MFBFX
MFBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MFBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MFBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Income Fund (MFIOX) and MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFIOXMFBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

1.73

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

5.65

+0.15

MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFIOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the MFBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFIOX and MFBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFIOX drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, smaller than the maximum MFBFX drawdown of -29.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIOX and MFBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFIOXMFBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.07%

-29.78%

+10.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-3.17%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.88%

-6.83%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.07%

-23.44%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.07%

-23.44%

+4.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-2.87%

+1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-6.19%

+4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.97%

-0.05%

Volatility

MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Income Fund (MFIOX) is 1.14%, while MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that MFIOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFIOXMFBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

1.21%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

3.07%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63%

4.08%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.52%

6.40%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.88%

5.74%

-0.86%

MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFIOX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than MFBFX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFIOX vs. MFBFX - Dividend Comparison

MFIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than MFBFX's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFBFX
MFS Corporate Bond Fund
4.53%4.54%3.74%3.16%2.46%5.61%3.47%3.01%3.15%3.07%3.27%4.16%
MFIOX
MFS Income Fund
4.70%4.70%5.04%4.72%2.24%3.29%2.80%3.04%3.07%3.26%3.61%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MFIOX and MFBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MFBFX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to MFIOX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFIOX dropped -19.07% vs MFBFX's -29.78%.

MFIOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFIOX and MFBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer