PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFIG vs. SGRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFIG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 48.90% return.


MFIG

1D
0.15%
1M
6.09%
YTD
4.46%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SGRT

1D
-1.69%
1M
9.59%
YTD
48.90%
6M
51.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFIG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MFIG and SGRT is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFIG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MFIG vs. SGRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFIGSGRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

3.63

-3.08

Drawdowns

MFIG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum SGRT drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and SGRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFIGSGRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-17.87%

+3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-1.69%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-3.10%

-1.51%

Volatility

MFIG vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFIGSGRTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

33.40%

-16.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

33.40%

-16.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

33.40%

-16.88%

MFIG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFIG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MFIG and SGRT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MFIG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MFIG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.

Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.59% for SGRT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFIG and SGRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer