PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFIG vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFIG vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 11.78% return.


MFIG

1D
0.15%
1M
6.09%
YTD
4.46%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHB

1D
0.45%
1M
4.65%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.45%
1Y
28.80%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
15.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFIG vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MFIG and SCHB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFIG vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFIG

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFIG vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MFIG vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFIGSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.83

-0.28

Drawdowns

MFIG vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFIGSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-35.27%

+20.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-0.27%

-1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-4.11%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

Volatility

MFIG vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFIGSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

12.11%

+4.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

17.24%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

18.31%

-1.79%

MFIG vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFIG vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFIG
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.01%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFIG and SCHB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFIG.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.

MFIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. MFIG tracks Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.03% for SCHB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFIG and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer