PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFIG vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFIG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.78% return.


MFIG

1D
0.15%
1M
6.09%
YTD
4.46%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
0.48%
1M
4.64%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.52%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFIG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MFIG and ITOT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFIG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFIG

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFIG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MFIG vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFIGITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.57

-0.02

Drawdowns

MFIG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFIGITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-55.20%

+40.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-0.25%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-6.97%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

Volatility

MFIG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFIGITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

12.19%

+4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

17.35%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

18.26%

-1.74%

MFIG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFIG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.97%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
MFIG
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFIG and ITOT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFIG.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.

MFIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. MFIG tracks Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.03% for ITOT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFIG and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer