MFIG vs. EMLP
MFIG (Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF) and EMLP (First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MFIG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while EMLP is a MLPs fund actively managed by First Trust. MFIG is passively managed, while EMLP is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. MFIG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for EMLP.
Performance
MFIG vs. EMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than EMLP's 16.00% return.
MFIG
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- -1.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMLP
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- YTD
- 16.00%
- 6M
- 15.88%
- 1Y
- 20.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
MFIG vs. EMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 0.01% | -0.09% |
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 16.00% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFIG and EMLP is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | -0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFIG vs. EMLP — Risk / Return Rank
MFIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMLP
MFIG vs. EMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFIG | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFIG vs. EMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum EMLP drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and EMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFIG | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -43.61% | +29.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | -2.46% | -3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -5.75% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.70% | — |
Volatility
MFIG vs. EMLP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFIG | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.04% | 9.97% | +7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 14.49% | +2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 17.68% | -0.64% |
MFIG vs. EMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLP's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFIG vs. EMLP - Dividend Comparison
MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.92% | 3.15% | 3.29% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.71% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 4.63% |
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFIG and EMLP have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFIG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFIG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.
EMLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.
MFIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EMLP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.96% for EMLP.
Find the right allocation for MFIG and EMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer