MFIG vs. DIG
MFIG (Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF) and DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) are both exchange-traded funds - MFIG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while DIG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. MFIG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DIG.
Performance
MFIG vs. DIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than DIG's 66.35% return.
MFIG
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 6.47%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIG
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- 66.35%
- 6M
- 59.45%
- 1Y
- 90.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.37%
- 5Y*
- 28.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.32%
MFIG vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 4.31% | -0.21% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 66.35% | -3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFIG and DIG is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFIG vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank
MFIG
DIG
MFIG vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFIG | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | -0.00 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
MFIG vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and DIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFIG | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -97.04% | +82.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -51.27% | +49.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -64.37% | +59.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.49% | — |
Volatility
MFIG vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFIG | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.58% | 40.88% | -24.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 51.59% | -35.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 57.81% | -41.23% |
MFIG vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DIG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFIG vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison
MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.50% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFIG and DIG have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFIG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFIG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DIG.
DIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.
MFIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DIG is Leveraged Equities. MFIG tracks Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while DIG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.95% for DIG.
Find the right allocation for MFIG and DIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer