PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFIG vs. DIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFIG vs. DIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than DIG's 66.35% return.


MFIG

1D
-1.31%
1M
6.47%
YTD
4.31%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIG

1D
2.57%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
66.35%
6M
59.45%
1Y
90.00%
3Y*
23.37%
5Y*
28.29%
10Y*
5.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFIG vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MFIG
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF
4.31%-0.21%
DIG
ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas
66.35%-3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MFIG and DIG is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

-0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFIG vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFIG

DIG
DIG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFIG vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MFIG vs. DIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFIGDIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

-0.00

+0.53

Drawdowns

MFIG vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and DIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFIGDIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-97.04%

+82.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

-51.27%

+49.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-64.37%

+59.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.49%

Volatility

MFIG vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFIGDIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.58%

40.88%

-24.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

51.59%

-35.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

57.81%

-41.23%

MFIG vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DIG's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFIG vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison

MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIG
ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas
1.50%2.62%3.13%0.61%1.33%2.24%3.18%2.72%2.30%1.76%1.09%1.56%
MFIG
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFIG and DIG have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MFIG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MFIG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DIG.

DIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.

MFIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DIG is Leveraged Equities. MFIG tracks Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while DIG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.95% for DIG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFIG and DIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer