MFIC vs. TUGN
MFIC (MidCap Financial Investment Corporation) is a stock, while TUGN (STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF) is Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by STF. Over the past 3 years, MFIC returned 7.31%/yr vs 22.84%/yr for TUGN. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MFIC vs. TUGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFIC achieves a -6.27% return, which is significantly lower than TUGN's 19.35% return.
MFIC
- 1D
- -4.32%
- 1M
- -14.19%
- YTD
- -6.27%
- 6M
- -9.35%
- 1Y
- -9.73%
- 3Y*
- 7.31%
- 5Y*
- 5.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
TUGN
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 11.07%
- YTD
- 19.35%
- 6M
- 17.92%
- 1Y
- 36.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFIC vs. TUGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFIC MidCap Financial Investment Corporation | -6.27% | -4.34% | 11.25% | 35.48% | 4.72% |
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF | 19.35% | 19.11% | 18.44% | 34.84% | -18.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFIC and TUGN is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2022 | 0.35 |
The correlation between MFIC and TUGN shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFIC vs. TUGN — Risk / Return Rank
MFIC
TUGN
MFIC vs. TUGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (MFIC) and STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFIC | TUGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.43 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 2.87 | -3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 10.00 | -11.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFIC | TUGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 2.44 | -2.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.97 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
MFIC vs. TUGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFIC drawdown since its inception was -87.97%, which is greater than TUGN's maximum drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIC and TUGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFIC | TUGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.97% | -23.45% | -64.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.46% | -12.96% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.97% | -21.60% | -5.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.08% | -0.29% | -17.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.53% | -6.43% | -11.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 3.71% | +4.98% |
Volatility
MFIC vs. TUGN - Volatility Comparison
MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (MFIC) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) at 5.26%. This indicates that MFIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TUGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFIC | TUGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 5.26% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.13% | 11.63% | +8.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.38% | 15.25% | +8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 17.03% | +5.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.03% | 17.03% | +13.00% |
Dividends
MFIC vs. TUGN - Dividend Comparison
MFIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.94%, more than TUGN's 10.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFIC MidCap Financial Investment Corporation | 13.94% | 13.29% | 12.75% | 11.11% | 12.37% | 11.26% | 15.25% | 10.31% | 14.52% | 10.60% | 11.95% | 15.33% |
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF | 10.50% | 11.50% | 11.84% | 10.83% | 7.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFIC and TUGN have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFIC has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to TUGN (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFIC dropped -87.97% vs TUGN's -23.45%.
TUGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFIC and TUGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer