PortfoliosLab logo
MFIC vs. GBDC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MFIC and GBDC is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MFIC vs. GBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (MFIC) and Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MFIC:

-0.21

GBDC:

0.09

Sortino Ratio

MFIC:

-0.03

GBDC:

0.26

Omega Ratio

MFIC:

1.00

GBDC:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

MFIC:

-0.14

GBDC:

0.10

Martin Ratio

MFIC:

-0.35

GBDC:

0.27

Ulcer Index

MFIC:

10.66%

GBDC:

5.98%

Daily Std Dev

MFIC:

25.86%

GBDC:

18.72%

Max Drawdown

MFIC:

-87.97%

GBDC:

-48.15%

Current Drawdown

MFIC:

-8.41%

GBDC:

-3.13%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MFIC:

$1.22B

GBDC:

$4.07B

EPS

MFIC:

$1.20

GBDC:

$1.08

PE Ratio

MFIC:

10.94

GBDC:

14.08

PS Ratio

MFIC:

3.92

GBDC:

4.90

PB Ratio

MFIC:

0.88

GBDC:

1.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

MFIC:

$113.46M

GBDC:

$567.21M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MFIC:

$55.05M

GBDC:

$300.65M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFIC achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than GBDC's 2.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MFIC has underperformed GBDC with an annualized return of 6.20%, while GBDC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.05% annualized return.


MFIC

YTD

0.24%

1M

11.84%

6M

-1.90%

1Y

-7.73%

3Y*

14.97%

5Y*

18.90%

10Y*

6.20%

GBDC

YTD

2.89%

1M

8.18%

6M

2.12%

1Y

0.11%

3Y*

13.90%

5Y*

15.15%

10Y*

8.05%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MFIC vs. GBDC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFIC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MFIC is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MFIC is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MFIC is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MFIC is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MFIC is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MFIC is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GBDC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GBDC is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GBDC is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GBDC is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GBDC is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GBDC is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GBDC is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MFIC vs. GBDC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (MFIC) and Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MFIC Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the GBDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFIC and GBDC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MFIC vs. GBDC - Dividend Comparison

MFIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.10%, more than GBDC's 8.68% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment Corporation
13.10%12.75%11.11%12.37%11.26%15.24%10.31%14.52%10.60%11.95%15.33%10.78%
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
8.68%12.14%10.00%9.35%7.58%8.37%5.91%8.49%7.47%8.32%7.70%7.14%

Drawdowns

MFIC vs. GBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFIC drawdown since its inception was -87.97%, which is greater than GBDC's maximum drawdown of -48.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIC and GBDC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MFIC vs. GBDC - Volatility Comparison

MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (MFIC) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) at 4.83%. This indicates that MFIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MFIC vs. GBDC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MidCap Financial Investment Corporation and Golub Capital BDC, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20212022202320242025
31.79M
154.11M
(MFIC) Total Revenue
(GBDC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items