PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MFG vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MFG vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MFG (Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, MFG returned 14.73%/yr vs 21.94%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MFG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFG achieves a 29.23% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MFG has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 14.73%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.

MFG

1D
1.94%
1M
12.49%
YTD
29.23%
6M
31.21%
1Y
73.14%
3Y*
50.32%
5Y*
29.32%
10Y*
14.73%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFG
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.		29.23%54.60%47.85%26.14%17.09%2.40%-15.06%3.00%-17.58%3.21%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MFG and QQQ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2006

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Invesco QQQ ETF

Often compared with MFG:
MFG vs. MUFGMFG vs. SMFGMFG vs. NMRMFG vs. SANMFG vs. MSMFG vs. SCHWMFG vs. NBN
Often compared with QQQ:
QQQ vs. SPYQQQ vs. VOOQQQ vs. VGTQQQ vs. TQQQQQQ vs. SMHQQQ vs. QQQMQQQ vs. QQQI

Return for Risk

MFG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MFG
MFG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFG Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MFGQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.43
2.64

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.11
3.45

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.45

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.51

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.91

13.49

-5.58

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFG vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFG Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFG and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MFGQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.64

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.81

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.99

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.41

-0.39

Drawdowns

MFG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFG drawdown since its inception was -80.57%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFG and QQQ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MFGQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.57%

-82.97%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.78%

-11.96%

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.33%

-22.77%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.33%

-35.12%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.87%

-35.12%

-14.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.24%

-0.26%

-5.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.91%

-32.79%

-28.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.28%

3.11%

+6.17%

Volatility

MFG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that MFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MFGQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.44%

4.49%

+4.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.65%

12.10%

+11.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.33%

15.94%

+14.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.59%

22.38%

+7.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.47%

22.29%

+4.18%

Dividends

MFG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

MFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFG
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.		0.99%2.68%3.20%3.73%4.34%2.76%2.71%0.00%0.00%1.86%3.77%3.10%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

MFG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFG has higher volatility (9.44%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFG dropped -80.57% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFG and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer