MFEX.L vs. MMS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MFEX.L (Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU) and MMS.L (Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - MFEX.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while MMS.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Both are passively managed. MFEX.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MMS.L.

Performance

MFEX.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MFEX.L

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 7.98%
• 6M: 9.49%
• 1Y: 20.95%
• 3Y*: 16.13%
• 5Y*: 83.37%
• 10Y*: —

MMS.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEX.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MFEX.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU	7.98%	30.65%	0.93%
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

MFEX.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MFEX.L	MMS.L
Financial Services	24.6%	16.9%
Industrials	21.4%	21.8%
Technology	16.6%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	10.9%
Utilities	6.1%	3.4%
Healthcare	5.8%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	1.7%
Communication Services	4.5%	3.0%
Energy	4.2%	5.6%
Basic Materials	2.8%	5.9%
Real Estate	0.9%	12.8%

Return for Risk

MFEX.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEX.L

MFEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
MFEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MFEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
MFEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MFEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MFEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEX.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFEX.L	MMS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.75	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFEX.L	MMS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MFEX.L	MMS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.13%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MFEX.L	MMS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.97%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	257.72%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	207.66%	—	—

MFEX.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEX.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFEX.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison

MFEX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while MMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MFEX.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU	3.02%	3.27%	2.82%	2.56%	87.78%	48.73%	40.59%	3.30%	0.44%
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MFEX.L or MMS.L?

On fees, MFEX.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFEX.L or MMS.L?

MFEX.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.

What is the main difference between MFEX.L and MMS.L?

MFEX.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MFEX.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.