MFEX.L vs. MEIKX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MFEX.L (Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU) and MEIKX (MFS Value Fund) are both funds - MFEX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while MEIKX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 5 years, MFEX.L returned 83.37%/yr vs 8.86%/yr for MEIKX. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MFEX.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for MEIKX.

Performance

MFEX.L vs. MEIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MFEX.L is traded in GBP, while MEIKX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MEIKX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEX.L achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly higher than MEIKX's 4.52% return.

MFEX.L

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 4.82%
• YTD: 7.98%
• 6M: 9.56%
• 1Y: 21.18%
• 3Y*: 16.13%
• 5Y*: 83.37%
• 10Y*: —

MEIKX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 4.52%
• 6M: 4.68%
• 1Y: 14.19%
• 3Y*: 10.38%
• 5Y*: 8.86%
• 10Y*: 10.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEX.L vs. MEIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MFEX.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU	7.98%	30.65%	4.68%	16.31%	525.11%	113.18%	71.48%	19.15%	-13.18%
MEIKX MFS Value Fund	4.52%	5.29%	13.94%	2.90%	5.27%	26.78%	1.03%	25.23%	-7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between MFEX.L and MEIKX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018	0.39

The correlation between MFEX.L and MEIKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MFEX.L vs. MEIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEX.L

MFEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
MFEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MFEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
MFEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MFEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MFEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 43

MEIKX

MEIKX Risk / Return Rank: 21
MEIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
MEIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
MEIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
MEIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
MEIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEX.L vs. MEIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFEX.L	MEIKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.26	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	1.75	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.22	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	2.25	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.75	6.75	+0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFEX.L vs. MEIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the MEIKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEX.L and MEIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFEX.L	MEIKX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.26	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.67	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.51	-0.22

Drawdowns

MFEX.L vs. MEIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEX.L drawdown since its inception was -31.42%, smaller than the maximum MEIKX drawdown of -36.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEX.L and MEIKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFEX.L	MEIKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.42%	-36.75%	+5.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.99%	-6.01%	-4.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.95%	-15.04%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.63%	-15.04%	-5.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-2.30%	+2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.13%	-5.51%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	2.00%	+1.13%

Volatility

MFEX.L vs. MEIKX - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) at 2.18%. This indicates that MFEX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFEX.L	MEIKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.53%	2.18%	+2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.46%	8.10%	+3.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.97%	10.70%	+3.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	257.72%	13.29%	+244.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	207.66%	16.75%	+190.91%

MFEX.L vs. MEIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEX.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIKX's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFEX.L vs. MEIKX - Dividend Comparison

MFEX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than MEIKX's 9.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MEIKX MFS Value Fund	9.54%	9.72%	9.49%	8.58%	7.77%	3.43%	2.75%	3.28%	3.76%	4.14%	3.84%	6.12%
MFEX.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU	3.02%	3.27%	2.82%	2.56%	87.78%	48.73%	40.59%	3.30%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFEX.L and MEIKX in my portfolio?

MFEX.L and MEIKX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.