MFEX.L vs. CMU.L
MFEX.L (Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFEX.L returned 83.37%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for CMU.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MFEX.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.
Performance
MFEX.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MFEX.L is traded in GBP, while CMU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFEX.L achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return.
MFEX.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 9.56%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 83.37%
- 10Y*
- —
CMU.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
MFEX.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEX.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU | 7.98% | 30.65% | 4.68% | 16.31% | 525.11% | 113.18% | 71.48% | 19.15% | -13.18% |
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 15.89% | 25.71% | 1.42% | 14.39% | -5.30% | 13.03% | 4.59% | 19.05% | -13.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFEX.L and CMU.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between MFEX.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFEX.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFEX.L
CMU.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
MFEX.L
CMU.L
Industrials
MFEX.L
CMU.L
Technology
MFEX.L
CMU.L
Consumer Cyclical
MFEX.L
CMU.L
Utilities
MFEX.L
CMU.L
Healthcare
MFEX.L
CMU.L
Consumer Defensive
MFEX.L
CMU.L
Communication Services
MFEX.L
CMU.L
Energy
MFEX.L
CMU.L
Basic Materials
MFEX.L
CMU.L
Real Estate
MFEX.L
CMU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFEX.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank
MFEX.L
CMU.L
MFEX.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFEX.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.37 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.58 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.75 | 9.67 | -2.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFEX.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.98 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.66 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.49 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
MFEX.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFEX.L drawdown since its inception was -31.42%, roughly equal to the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEX.L and CMU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFEX.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.42% | -32.53% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -11.43% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.95% | -11.95% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.63% | -21.11% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.18% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -5.80% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 3.05% | +0.08% |
Volatility
MFEX.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) is 4.53%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that MFEX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFEX.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 5.34% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 12.44% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 14.86% | -0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 257.72% | 16.00% | +241.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 207.66% | 16.78% | +190.88% |
MFEX.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFEX.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MFEX.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison
MFEX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFEX.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU | 3.02% | 3.27% | 2.82% | 2.56% | 87.78% | 48.73% | 40.59% | 3.30% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, MFEX.L and CMU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MFEX.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFEX.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CMU.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MFEX.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.
Find the right allocation for MFEX.L and CMU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer