MFEM vs. STXE
MFEM (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - MFEM tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index while STXE tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MFEM returned 15.79%/yr vs 23.32%/yr for STXE. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MFEM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.
Performance
MFEM vs. STXE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFEM achieves a 16.47% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 31.48% return.
MFEM
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- 6M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.85%
STXE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- YTD
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 56.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $581.34K | $458.22K | $623.99K | |
| $412.67K | $566.81K | $571.67K |
MFEM vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 16.47% | 25.33% | 4.73% | 6.75% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 31.48% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 12.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFEM and STXE is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between MFEM and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFEM vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFEM
STXE
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
MFEM
STXE
Financial Services
MFEM
STXE
Basic Materials
MFEM
STXE
Industrials
MFEM
STXE
Energy
MFEM
STXE
Consumer Cyclical
MFEM
STXE
Communication Services
MFEM
STXE
Consumer Defensive
MFEM
STXE
Utilities
MFEM
STXE
Healthcare
MFEM
STXE
Real Estate
MFEM
STXE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFEM vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank
MFEM
STXE
MFEM vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.34 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 2.73 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.82 | 10.29 | -4.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFEM vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFEM drawdown since its inception was -43.32%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEM and STXE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.32% | -20.38% | -22.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.05% | -20.38% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.22% | -20.38% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.43% | -14.59% | +2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -3.95% | -7.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | 5.39% | -0.31% |
Volatility
MFEM vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) is 7.50%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that MFEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | 13.05% | -5.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.84% | 28.09% | -7.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.65% | 29.83% | -7.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 20.17% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.70% | 20.17% | -0.47% |
MFEM vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFEM vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison
MFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than STXE's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.37% | 2.77% | 5.89% | 4.01% | 7.01% | 29.96% | 1.70% | 2.37% | 1.18% | 0.21% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.91% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFEM and STXE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STXE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to MFEM (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFEM dropped -43.32% vs STXE's -20.38%.
On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 23.32% vs 15.79% for MFEM. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, MFEM has been the lower-risk option at 7.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 23.32% return vs 15.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MFEM.
MFEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.91% for STXE.
MFEM tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MFEM and 0.32% for STXE.
STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFEM and STXE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer