MFEM vs. ECON

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON).

MFEM and ECON are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MFEM is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. ECON is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index. It was launched on Sep 14, 2010. Both MFEM and ECON are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

MFEM vs. ECON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MFEM vs. ECON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	8.20%	25.33%	4.73%	15.14%	-19.50%	10.77%	11.33%	15.26%	-14.64%	4.82%
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF	5.16%	34.15%	0.22%	7.51%	-16.00%	-14.11%	20.83%	17.22%	-26.87%	2.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEM achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly higher than ECON's 5.16% return.

MFEM

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -9.87%
• YTD: 8.20%
• 6M: 12.54%
• 1Y: 35.23%
• 3Y*: 16.17%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: —

ECON

• 1D: 3.72%
• 1M: -9.41%
• YTD: 5.16%
• 6M: 10.37%
• 1Y: 34.32%
• 3Y*: 13.54%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: 3.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEM vs. ECON - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MFEM and ECON have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

MFEM

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF

ECON

Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF

Return for Risk

MFEM vs. ECON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEM

MFEM Risk / Return Rank: 88
MFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
MFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

ECON

ECON Risk / Return Rank: 84
ECON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ECON Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ECON Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ECON Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ECON Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEM vs. ECON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFEM	ECON	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.70	+0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.30	+0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.33	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	2.49	+0.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.38	9.33	+1.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFEM vs. ECON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the ECON Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEM and ECON, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFEM	ECON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	1.70	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.09	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.16	+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between MFEM and ECON is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MFEM vs. ECON - Dividend Comparison

MFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than ECON's 1.68% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.56%	2.77%	5.89%	4.01%	7.01%	29.96%	1.70%	2.37%	1.18%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF	1.68%	1.77%	0.76%	1.57%	2.06%	1.08%	0.63%	1.68%	0.98%	0.35%	0.74%	1.10%

Drawdowns

MFEM vs. ECON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEM drawdown since its inception was -43.32%, roughly equal to the maximum ECON drawdown of -45.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEM and ECON.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFEM	ECON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.32%	-45.37%	+2.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.86%	-13.76%	+0.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.39%	-38.08%	+6.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.31%	-10.55%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.67%	-16.81%	+5.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	3.66%	-0.30%

Volatility

MFEM vs. ECON - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) have volatilities of 10.30% and 10.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFEM	ECON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.30%	10.51%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.44%	15.20%	-0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.72%	20.30%	-1.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.12%	19.82%	-3.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.22%	20.84%	-1.62%