PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFEM vs. AVXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFEM vs. AVXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEM achieves a 31.49% return, which is significantly lower than AVXC's 34.06% return.


MFEM

1D
-1.14%
1M
9.48%
YTD
31.49%
6M
33.22%
1Y
54.64%
3Y*
23.28%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*

AVXC

1D
-1.44%
1M
10.62%
YTD
34.06%
6M
38.17%
1Y
62.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEM vs. AVXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MFEM and AVXC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024

0.85

The correlation between MFEM and AVXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFEM vs. AVXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MFEM
AVXC

Technology

23.1%
38.2%

Financial Services

17.7%
20.2%

Basic Materials

15.1%
8.1%

Industrials

12.2%
10.0%

Energy

8.7%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
5.5%

Communication Services

4.8%
3.7%

Utilities

3.9%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
2.9%

Healthcare

1.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.5%

Technology

MFEM
23.1%
AVXC
38.2%

Financial Services

MFEM
17.7%
AVXC
20.2%

Basic Materials

MFEM
15.1%
AVXC
8.1%

Industrials

MFEM
12.2%
AVXC
10.0%

Energy

MFEM
8.7%
AVXC
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MFEM
8.3%
AVXC
5.5%

Communication Services

MFEM
4.8%
AVXC
3.7%

Utilities

MFEM
3.9%
AVXC
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

MFEM
3.5%
AVXC
2.9%

Healthcare

MFEM
1.7%
AVXC
2.3%

Real Estate

MFEM
1.1%
AVXC
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFEM vs. AVXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEM
MFEM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEM vs. AVXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFEMAVXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.56

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

4.47

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.72

18.06

-2.34

MFEM vs. AVXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the AVXC Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEM and AVXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFEMAVXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

3.12

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.58

-1.14

Drawdowns

MFEM vs. AVXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEM drawdown since its inception was -43.32%, which is greater than AVXC's maximum drawdown of -20.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEM and AVXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFEMAVXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.32%

-20.44%

-22.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-14.04%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-1.44%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.49%

-3.79%

-7.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

3.46%

+0.03%

Volatility

MFEM vs. AVXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) is 8.47%, while Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that MFEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFEMAVXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.47%

9.00%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.92%

17.67%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

20.07%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

18.47%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.40%

18.47%

+0.93%

MFEM vs. AVXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AVXC's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFEM vs. AVXC - Dividend Comparison

MFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than AVXC's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
1.49%1.97%1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFEM
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.12%2.77%5.89%4.01%7.01%29.96%1.70%2.37%1.18%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFEM and AVXC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVXC has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to MFEM (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFEM dropped -43.32% vs AVXC's -20.44%.

On 1-year performance, AVXC leads with 62.37% vs 54.64% for MFEM. On fees, AVXC is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, MFEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVXC has performed better with a 62.37% return vs 54.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVXC is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MFEM.

MFEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.49% for AVXC.

MFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AVXC is Emerging Markets Diversified. MFEM tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index, while AVXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets IMI. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Avantis Investors. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MFEM and 0.33% for AVXC.

AVXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFEM and AVXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer