MFBFX vs. SMARX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MFBFX (MFS Corporate Bond Fund) and SMARX (Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, MFBFX returned 2.40%/yr vs 3.00%/yr for SMARX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFBFX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SMARX.

Performance

MFBFX vs. SMARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX) and Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with MFBFX at 0.61% and SMARX at 0.61%. Over the past 10 years, MFBFX has underperformed SMARX with an annualized return of 2.40%, while SMARX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.00% annualized return.

MFBFX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 6.15%
• 3Y*: 4.90%
• 5Y*: 0.02%
• 10Y*: 2.40%

SMARX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 5.26%
• 3Y*: 5.54%
• 5Y*: 1.90%
• 10Y*: 3.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFBFX vs. SMARX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFBFX MFS Corporate Bond Fund	0.61%	7.35%	2.03%	8.09%	-17.27%	-1.47%	11.01%	14.43%	-3.19%	6.08%
SMARX Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust	0.61%	6.91%	3.73%	9.76%	-11.77%	0.76%	6.55%	7.77%	-1.13%	4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MFBFX and SMARX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2005	0.75

The correlation between MFBFX and SMARX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.93 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MFBFX vs. SMARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFBFX

MFBFX Risk / Return Rank: 25
MFBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
MFBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MFBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
MFBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
MFBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

SMARX

SMARX Risk / Return Rank: 27
SMARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SMARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
SMARX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
SMARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SMARX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFBFX vs. SMARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX) and Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFBFX	SMARX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.37	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.07	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.25	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	2.19	-0.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.78	7.63	-0.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFBFX vs. SMARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the SMARX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFBFX and SMARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFBFX	SMARX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	1.37	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	0.37	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.69	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.41	+0.07

Drawdowns

MFBFX vs. SMARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFBFX drawdown since its inception was -29.78%, smaller than the maximum SMARX drawdown of -47.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFBFX and SMARX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFBFX	SMARX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.78%	-47.07%	+17.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.17%	-2.61%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.83%	-5.19%	-1.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.44%	-16.20%	-7.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.44%	-16.20%	-7.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.95%	-0.70%	-2.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-6.98%	+0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	0.75%	+0.19%

Volatility

MFBFX vs. SMARX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX) at 1.35%. This indicates that MFBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFBFX	SMARX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.43%	1.35%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.05%	2.87%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.15%	3.75%	+0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.40%	5.16%	+1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.73%	4.39%	+1.34%

MFBFX vs. SMARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFBFX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SMARX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFBFX vs. SMARX - Dividend Comparison

MFBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than SMARX's 4.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MFBFX MFS Corporate Bond Fund	4.53%	4.54%	3.74%	3.16%	2.46%	5.61%	3.47%	3.01%	3.15%	3.07%	3.27%	4.16%
SMARX Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust	4.77%	5.02%	4.07%	3.85%	3.53%	2.57%	3.35%	4.19%	4.55%	4.20%	4.87%	5.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFBFX and SMARX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, MFBFX and SMARX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MFBFX or SMARX?

MFBFX has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to SMARX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFBFX dropped -29.78% vs SMARX's -47.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.