PortfoliosLab logo
MFBFX vs. MSFRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MFBFX and MSFRX is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MFBFX vs. MSFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX) and MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MFBFX:

1.10

MSFRX:

0.81

Sortino Ratio

MFBFX:

1.38

MSFRX:

0.95

Omega Ratio

MFBFX:

1.16

MSFRX:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

MFBFX:

0.43

MSFRX:

0.68

Martin Ratio

MFBFX:

2.56

MSFRX:

2.34

Ulcer Index

MFBFX:

2.03%

MSFRX:

2.67%

Daily Std Dev

MFBFX:

5.55%

MSFRX:

9.70%

Max Drawdown

MFBFX:

-22.83%

MSFRX:

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

MFBFX:

-6.69%

MSFRX:

-2.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFBFX achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than MSFRX's 2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MFBFX has underperformed MSFRX with an annualized return of 2.43%, while MSFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.34% annualized return.


MFBFX

YTD

1.53%

1M

-0.35%

6M

0.48%

1Y

6.07%

3Y*

2.51%

5Y*

-0.07%

10Y*

2.43%

MSFRX

YTD

2.36%

1M

1.69%

6M

-2.15%

1Y

7.78%

3Y*

5.76%

5Y*

7.61%

10Y*

6.34%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFS Corporate Bond Fund

MFS Total Return Fund

MFBFX vs. MSFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFBFX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFRX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MFBFX vs. MSFRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFBFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MFBFX is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MFBFX is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MFBFX is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MFBFX is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MFBFX is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MFBFX is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFRX is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFRX is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFRX is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFRX is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFRX is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFRX is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MFBFX vs. MSFRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX) and MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MFBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the MSFRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFBFX and MSFRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MFBFX vs. MSFRX - Dividend Comparison

MFBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than MSFRX's 8.59% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MFBFX
MFS Corporate Bond Fund
4.54%4.48%3.83%3.28%5.61%3.48%3.03%3.16%3.08%3.27%3.87%3.61%
MSFRX
MFS Total Return Fund
8.59%8.67%6.19%5.38%8.33%6.93%3.22%4.99%5.67%3.54%5.77%4.58%

Drawdowns

MFBFX vs. MSFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFBFX drawdown since its inception was -22.83%, smaller than the maximum MSFRX drawdown of -36.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFBFX and MSFRX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MFBFX vs. MSFRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX) is 1.41%, while MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that MFBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...