MFBFX vs. FCBFX
MFBFX (MFS Corporate Bond Fund) and FCBFX (Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, MFBFX returned 2.40%/yr vs 2.75%/yr for FCBFX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFBFX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for FCBFX.
Performance
MFBFX vs. FCBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFBFX achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than FCBFX's 0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MFBFX has underperformed FCBFX with an annualized return of 2.40%, while FCBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.75% annualized return.
MFBFX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- 4.90%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- 2.40%
FCBFX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- 0.15%
- 10Y*
- 2.75%
MFBFX vs. FCBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFBFX MFS Corporate Bond Fund | 0.70% | 7.35% | 2.03% | 8.09% | -17.27% | -1.47% | 11.01% | 14.43% | -3.19% | 6.08% |
FCBFX Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund | 0.46% | 7.86% | 2.82% | 8.82% | -17.11% | -1.59% | 10.59% | 14.48% | -2.56% | 6.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFBFX and FCBFX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between MFBFX and FCBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFBFX vs. FCBFX — Risk / Return Rank
MFBFX
FCBFX
MFBFX vs. FCBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX) and Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFBFX | FCBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.22 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.63 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 5.14 | +0.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFBFX vs. FCBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFBFX drawdown since its inception was -29.78%, which is greater than FCBFX's maximum drawdown of -23.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFBFX and FCBFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFBFX | FCBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.78% | -23.23% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -3.31% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.83% | -6.57% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.44% | -23.21% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.44% | -23.23% | -0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -1.13% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -3.97% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 1.05% | -0.08% |
Volatility
MFBFX vs. FCBFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX) is 1.21%, while Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) has a volatility of 1.30%. This indicates that MFBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFBFX | FCBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | 1.30% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.07% | 3.19% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08% | 4.25% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.40% | 6.69% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 5.96% | -0.22% |
MFBFX vs. FCBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFBFX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FCBFX's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFBFX vs. FCBFX - Dividend Comparison
MFBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than FCBFX's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBFX Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund | 4.24% | 4.11% | 3.95% | 3.74% | 2.53% | 2.82% | 3.19% | 3.28% | 3.65% | 3.16% | 3.55% | 3.01% |
MFBFX MFS Corporate Bond Fund | 4.53% | 4.54% | 3.74% | 3.16% | 2.46% | 5.61% | 3.47% | 3.01% | 3.15% | 3.07% | 3.27% | 4.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, MFBFX and FCBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FCBFX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to MFBFX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFBFX dropped -29.78% vs FCBFX's -23.23%.
MFBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFBFX and FCBFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer