MFBFX vs. JMABX
MFBFX (MFS Corporate Bond Fund) and JMABX (John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, MFBFX returned -0.22%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for JMABX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFBFX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for JMABX.
Performance
MFBFX vs. JMABX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MFBFX having a 0.37% return and JMABX slightly higher at 0.38%.
MFBFX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.22%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
JMABX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 5.74%
- 3Y*
- 6.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- —
MFBFX vs. JMABX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFBFX MFS Corporate Bond Fund | 0.37% | 7.35% | 2.03% | 8.09% | -17.27% | -1.47% | 11.01% | 3.97% |
JMABX John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio | 0.38% | 8.88% | 4.42% | 8.05% | -15.50% | 0.33% | 7.74% | 2.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFBFX and JMABX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between MFBFX and JMABX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFBFX vs. JMABX — Risk / Return Rank
MFBFX
JMABX
MFBFX vs. JMABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX) and John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFBFX | JMABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 2.08 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.19 | 7.26 | -2.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFBFX vs. JMABX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFBFX drawdown since its inception was -29.78%, which is greater than JMABX's maximum drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFBFX and JMABX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFBFX | JMABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.78% | -21.48% | -8.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -2.89% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.83% | -5.71% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.44% | -21.48% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -1.08% | -2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -6.14% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.83% | +0.14% |
Volatility
MFBFX vs. JMABX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX) at 1.09%. This indicates that MFBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFBFX | JMABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 1.09% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.09% | 2.64% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.10% | 3.58% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.40% | 5.53% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 5.86% | -0.12% |
MFBFX vs. JMABX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFBFX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than JMABX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFBFX vs. JMABX - Dividend Comparison
MFBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than JMABX's 5.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMABX John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio | 5.64% | 5.59% | 5.26% | 3.59% | 3.28% | 3.99% | 2.74% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFBFX MFS Corporate Bond Fund | 4.54% | 4.54% | 3.74% | 3.16% | 2.46% | 5.61% | 3.47% | 3.01% | 3.15% | 3.07% | 3.27% | 4.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, MFBFX and JMABX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MFBFX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to JMABX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFBFX dropped -29.78% vs JMABX's -21.48%.
JMABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFBFX and JMABX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer