JMABX vs. PBBBX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JMABX (John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio) and PBBBX (PIA BBB Bond Fund) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, JMABX returned 0.95%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PBBBX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMABX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PBBBX.

Performance

JMABX vs. PBBBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX) and PIA BBB Bond Fund (PBBBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JMABX having a 0.61% return and PBBBX slightly lower at 0.60%.

JMABX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: 6.22%
• 3Y*: 6.26%
• 5Y*: 0.95%
• 10Y*: —

PBBBX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 0.60%
• 6M: 0.91%
• 1Y: 5.54%
• 3Y*: 5.65%
• 5Y*: 0.40%
• 10Y*: 2.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMABX vs. PBBBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
JMABX John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio	0.61%	8.88%	4.42%	8.05%	-15.50%	0.33%	7.74%	2.72%
PBBBX PIA BBB Bond Fund	0.60%	8.14%	2.41%	9.19%	-16.35%	-1.20%	9.37%	5.08%

Correlation

The correlation between JMABX and PBBBX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2019	0.89

The correlation between JMABX and PBBBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JMABX vs. PBBBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMABX

JMABX Risk / Return Rank: 42
JMABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
JMABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
JMABX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
JMABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
JMABX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

PBBBX

PBBBX Risk / Return Rank: 26
PBBBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
PBBBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
PBBBX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
PBBBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
PBBBX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMABX vs. PBBBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX) and PIA BBB Bond Fund (PBBBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JMABX	PBBBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.40	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	2.05	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.25	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	1.72	+0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.58	5.21	+2.37

JMABX vs. PBBBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMABX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the PBBBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMABX and PBBBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JMABX vs. PBBBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMABX drawdown since its inception was -21.48%, smaller than the maximum PBBBX drawdown of -23.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMABX and PBBBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMABX	PBBBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.48%	-23.00%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.89%	-3.30%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.71%	-6.39%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.48%	-23.00%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-1.02%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.15%	-3.48%	-2.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	1.09%	-0.27%

Volatility

JMABX vs. PBBBX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX) and PIA BBB Bond Fund (PBBBX) have volatilities of 1.14% and 1.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMABX	PBBBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	1.20%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.63%	3.11%	-0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.57%	4.07%	-0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.53%	6.68%	-1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.86%	6.03%	-0.17%

JMABX vs. PBBBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMABX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PBBBX's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JMABX vs. PBBBX - Dividend Comparison

JMABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than PBBBX's 3.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JMABX John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio	5.63%	5.59%	5.26%	3.59%	3.28%	3.99%	2.74%	0.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBBBX PIA BBB Bond Fund	3.77%	4.02%	3.82%	3.57%	3.24%	2.85%	3.16%	3.78%	4.20%	3.75%	3.95%	4.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMABX and PBBBX in my portfolio?

JMABX and PBBBX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMABX or PBBBX?

PBBBX has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to JMABX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMABX dropped -21.48% vs PBBBX's -23.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JMABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.