MFA vs. GPMT
MFA (MFA Financial, Inc.) and GPMT (Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Mortgage industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 5 years, MFA returned 0.22%/yr vs -31.48%/yr for GPMT. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MFA vs. GPMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFA achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than GPMT's -43.04% return.
MFA
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 6.33%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 0.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.15%
GPMT
- 1D
- -6.38%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- -43.04%
- 6M
- -42.55%
- 1Y
- -40.12%
- 3Y*
- -30.22%
- 5Y*
- -31.48%
- 10Y*
- —
MFA vs. GPMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFA MFA Financial, Inc. | 6.33% | 6.07% | 2.63% | 30.66% | -37.20% | 27.71% | -40.87% | 27.54% | -5.85% | -0.17% |
GPMT Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. | -43.04% | -7.03% | -49.00% | 28.79% | -48.31% | 26.55% | -41.53% | 11.51% | 11.09% | 0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFA and GPMT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MFA and GPMT has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
MFA:
$1.70
GPMT:
-$0.85
MFA:
2.19
GPMT:
0.47
MFA:
$343.42M
GPMT:
$132.94M
MFA:
$413.35M
GPMT:
$74.25M
MFA:
$341.51M
GPMT:
$16.09M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFA vs. GPMT — Risk / Return Rank
MFA
GPMT
MFA vs. GPMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) and Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFA | GPMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.86 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | -0.73 | +2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.15 | -1.32 | +4.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFA vs. GPMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFA drawdown since its inception was -95.52%, which is greater than GPMT's maximum drawdown of -87.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFA and GPMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFA | GPMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.52% | -87.96% | -7.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.22% | -54.89% | +42.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | -74.35% | +42.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.54% | -85.73% | +29.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.67% | -86.91% | +55.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -40.82% | +19.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.56% | 30.41% | -24.85% |
Volatility
MFA vs. GPMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) is 6.62%, while Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that MFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFA | GPMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.62% | 11.67% | -5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.24% | 36.85% | -19.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.64% | 45.94% | -23.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.59% | 43.83% | -12.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.77% | 85.52% | -0.75% |
Dividends
MFA vs. GPMT - Dividend Comparison
MFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.11%, which matches GPMT's 15.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPMT Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. | 15.15% | 8.33% | 10.75% | 13.47% | 17.72% | 8.54% | 6.51% | 9.14% | 8.99% | 3.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFA MFA Financial, Inc. | 15.11% | 15.47% | 13.74% | 12.42% | 16.95% | 8.44% | 8.35% | 10.46% | 11.98% | 10.10% | 10.48% | 12.12% |
Financials
MFA vs. GPMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MFA Financial, Inc. and Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MFA and GPMT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPMT has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to MFA (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFA dropped -95.52% vs GPMT's -87.96%.
MFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFA and GPMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer