PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METW vs. TRUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METW vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -19.43% return, which is significantly lower than TRUT's 16.13% return.


METW

1D
-0.28%
1M
-9.52%
YTD
-19.43%
6M
-20.16%
1Y
-26.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TRUT

1D
-3.32%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
16.13%
6M
14.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METW vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
METW
Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF
-19.43%-15.16%
TRUT
Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF
16.13%9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between METW and TRUT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METW vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METW
METW Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
METW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METW Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
METW Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
METW Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
METW Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TRUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METW vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


METWTRUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

METW vs. TRUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

METW vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and TRUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METWTRUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.52%

-18.55%

-21.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.08%

-8.67%

-27.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.08%

-5.27%

-12.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.11%

Volatility

METW vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METWTRUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.19%

23.21%

+19.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.09%

23.21%

+19.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.09%

23.21%

+19.88%

METW vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

METW vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.02%, more than TRUT's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025
METW
Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF
66.02%30.89%
TRUT
Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF
0.20%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


METW and TRUT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for METW.

METW has the higher dividend yield at 66.02%, compared with 0.20% for TRUT.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.13% for TRUT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METW and TRUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer