METW vs. PLTW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index, while PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. METW is passively managed, while PLTW is actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.

Performance

METW vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -26.21% return.

METW

• 1D: 5.19%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: -8.79%
• 6M: -5.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTW

• 1D: -7.81%
• 1M: -4.39%
• YTD: -26.21%
• 6M: -26.03%
• 1Y: -0.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METW vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	-8.79%	-8.20%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-26.21%	26.92%

Correlation

The correlation between METW and PLTW is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.30

METW vs. PLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METW	PLTW
Communication Services	23.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	20.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

METW vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 9
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 11
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METW vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METW	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	0.19	-0.59

Drawdowns

METW vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -46.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	METW	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.52%	-46.29%	+5.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-46.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.63%	-39.64%	+12.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.31%	-19.57%	+2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	25.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METW	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	22.32%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.57%	61.73%	-19.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.57%	72.85%	-30.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.57%	72.85%	-30.28%

METW vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

METW vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.37%, less than PLTW's 121.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	55.37%	30.89%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	121.30%	72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METW and PLTW in my portfolio?

METW and PLTW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, METW or PLTW?

On fees, METW is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, METW or PLTW?

METW is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METW or PLTW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 121.30%, compared with 55.37% for METW.

What is the main difference between METW and PLTW?

METW is categorized as Technology Equities, while PLTW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.99% for PLTW.