METW vs. MAGS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from Roundhill. METW is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.

Performance

METW vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's 3.73% return.

METW

• 1D: 5.19%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: -8.79%
• 6M: -5.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAGS

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 2.17%
• YTD: 3.73%
• 6M: 3.62%
• 1Y: 31.34%
• 3Y*: 33.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METW vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	-8.79%	-8.20%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	3.73%	25.24%

Correlation

The correlation between METW and MAGS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.68

METW vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METW	MAGS
Communication Services	23.2%	9.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	15.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

METW vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 39
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METW vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METW	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	1.55	-1.95

Drawdowns

METW vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	METW	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.52%	-29.91%	-10.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.62%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.63%	-3.55%	-24.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.31%	-4.70%	-12.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METW	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.57%	20.08%	+22.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.57%	25.94%	+16.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.57%	25.94%	+16.63%

METW vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

METW vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.37%, more than MAGS's 1.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.43%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	55.37%	30.89%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METW and MAGS in my portfolio?

METW and MAGS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, METW or MAGS?

On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, METW or MAGS?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for METW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METW or MAGS?

METW has the higher dividend yield at 55.37%, compared with 1.43% for MAGS.

What is the main difference between METW and MAGS?

Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.29% for MAGS.