PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METW vs. KROP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METW vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -8.10% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 16.59% return.


METW

1D
0.76%
1M
4.26%
YTD
-8.10%
6M
-8.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KROP

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
16.59%
6M
14.86%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
0.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METW vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
METW
Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF
-8.10%-8.20%
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
16.59%-4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between METW and KROP is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

0.15

METW vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
METW
KROP

Communication Services

23.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

32.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

26.3%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.3%

Industrials

-

39.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

METW
23.2%
KROP

-

Basic Materials

METW

-

KROP
32.1%

Consumer Cyclical

METW

-

KROP
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

METW

-

KROP
26.3%

Energy

METW

-

KROP

-

Financial Services

METW

-

KROP

-

Healthcare

METW

-

KROP
0.3%

Industrials

METW

-

KROP
39.7%

Real Estate

METW

-

KROP

-

Technology

METW

-

KROP

-

Utilities

METW

-

KROP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METW vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METW

KROP
KROP Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METW vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

METW vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METWKROPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

-0.57

+0.18

Drawdowns

METW vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and KROP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METWKROPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.52%

-61.96%

+21.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.08%

-48.93%

+21.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.35%

-44.50%

+27.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.99%

Volatility

METW vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METWKROPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.49%

16.04%

+26.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.49%

22.27%

+20.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.49%

22.27%

+20.22%

METW vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

METW vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.95%, more than KROP's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
2.34%2.73%1.89%1.36%0.71%0.69%
METW
Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF
54.95%30.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


METW and KROP have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for METW.

METW has the higher dividend yield at 54.95%, compared with 2.34% for KROP.

METW tracks Ball Metaverse Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.50% for KROP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METW and KROP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer