METW vs. IDGT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) and IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - METW tracks the Ball Metaverse Index while IDGT tracks the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, METW returned -11.12% vs 38.58% for IDGT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IDGT.

Performance

METW vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 33.33% return.

METW

• 1D: -3.04%
• 1M: 12.30%
• 6M: 5.60%
• YTD: -2.29%
• 1Y: -11.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IDGT

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: -8.79%
• 6M: 29.39%
• YTD: 33.33%
• 1Y: 38.58%
• 3Y*: 19.26%
• 5Y*: 10.85%
• 10Y*: 12.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METW vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	-2.29%	-9.14%
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	33.33%	7.21%

Correlation

The correlation between METW and IDGT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.26

METW vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METW	IDGT
Communication Services	23.8%	6.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	35.5%
Technology	-	57.5%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

METW vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METW

METW Risk / Return Rank: 7
METW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
METW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
METW Omega Ratio Rank: 8
METW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
METW Martin Ratio Rank: 7

IDGT

IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 65
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 62
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METW vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METW	IDGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	1.75	-1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.04	2.35	-2.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.30	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	2.63	-2.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.50	9.23	-9.73

METW vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METW Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METW and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METW vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and IDGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	METW	IDGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.52%	-77.95%	+37.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.52%	-14.73%	-25.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.47%	-14.73%	-7.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.77%	-19.86%	+1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.42%	4.19%	+18.23%

Volatility

METW vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) has a higher volatility of 18.87% compared to iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) at 7.13%. This indicates that METW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METW	IDGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.87%	7.13%	+11.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.21%	18.74%	+18.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.05%	22.18%	+23.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.04%	23.48%	+21.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.04%	23.32%	+21.72%

METW vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

METW vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.86%, more than IDGT's 0.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	0.80%	1.17%	1.64%	0.37%	0.30%	0.28%	0.60%	0.42%	0.65%	0.57%	0.75%	0.72%
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	53.86%	30.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METW and IDGT in my portfolio?

METW and IDGT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METW or IDGT?

METW has higher volatility (18.87%) compared to IDGT (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METW dropped -40.52% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

Which ETF is better, METW or IDGT?

On 1-year performance, IDGT leads with 38.58% vs -11.12% for METW. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 7.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METW or IDGT?

Over the 1-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 38.58% return vs -11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METW or IDGT?

IDGT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for METW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METW or IDGT?

METW has the higher dividend yield at 53.86%, compared with 0.80% for IDGT.

What is the main difference between METW and IDGT?

METW tracks Ball Metaverse Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.39% for IDGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.