METW vs. IDGT
METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) and IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - METW tracks the Ball Metaverse Index while IDGT tracks the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for IDGT.
Performance
METW vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 53.90% return.
METW
- 1D
- 5.19%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- -8.79%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDGT
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 8.43%
- YTD
- 53.90%
- 6M
- 49.82%
- 1Y
- 63.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
METW vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | -8.79% | -8.20% |
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 53.90% | 6.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between METW and IDGT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.27 |
METW vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
METW
IDGT
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
METW
IDGT
Basic Materials
METW
-
IDGT
-
Consumer Cyclical
METW
-
IDGT
-
Consumer Defensive
METW
-
IDGT
-
Energy
METW
-
IDGT
-
Financial Services
METW
-
IDGT
-
Healthcare
METW
-
IDGT
-
Industrials
METW
-
IDGT
-
Real Estate
METW
-
IDGT
Technology
METW
-
IDGT
Utilities
METW
-
IDGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METW vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank
METW
IDGT
METW vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METW | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | 0.18 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
METW vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and IDGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METW | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.52% | -77.95% | +37.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.63% | -1.58% | -26.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -19.91% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.81% | — |
Volatility
METW vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METW | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.57% | 20.41% | +22.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.57% | 23.20% | +19.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.57% | 23.29% | +19.28% |
METW vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
METW vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison
METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.37%, more than IDGT's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.64% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.60% | 0.42% | 0.65% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 0.72% |
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | 55.37% | 30.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METW and IDGT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for METW.
METW has the higher dividend yield at 55.37%, compared with 0.72% for IDGT.
METW tracks Ball Metaverse Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.41% for IDGT.
Find the right allocation for METW and IDGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer