PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METW vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METW vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


METW

1D
5.19%
1M
2.24%
YTD
-8.79%
6M
-5.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METW vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
METW
Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF
-8.79%-8.20%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-11.48%

Correlation

The correlation between METW and DBE is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METW vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METW

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METW vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

METW vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METWDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.09

-0.49

Drawdowns

METW vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METWDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.52%

-86.69%

+46.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.63%

-30.27%

+2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-57.31%

+40.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.35%

Volatility

METW vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METWDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.57%

34.97%

+7.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.57%

29.39%

+13.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.57%

28.33%

+14.24%

METW vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

METW vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.37%, more than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
METW
Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF
55.37%30.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


METW and DBE have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, METW is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

METW is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

METW has the higher dividend yield at 55.37%, compared with 2.10% for DBE.

METW is categorized as Technology Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. METW tracks Ball Metaverse Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.78% for DBE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METW and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer